Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roberdan

Roberdan was proposed for deletion. This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was DELETE

Shameless advert for a blog. Delete. Lupo 12:56, 19 Jul 2004 (UTC) The complete content was
 * Speedy deleted -- Chris 73 | Talk 13:06, 19 Jul 2004 (UTC)
 * For the record, which of the criteria for speedy deletion did this article meet? Those of us who missed the 10 minute window between Lupo's posting and Chris' deletion only have the descriptions above which do not appear to meet the speedy delete criteria. Rossami 13:42, 19 Jul 2004 (UTC)
 * # 4. (The article was just three URLs, two going to the blog, the third to some Microsoft web site on this SharePoint thingy.) Lupo 13:53, 19 Jul 2004 (UTC)
 * Thank you for the explanation. I'm not sure I agree that it met the criteria for a speedy. From your description, though, I probably would have voted to delete. Rossami
 * I believe it met the speedy deletion requirements. DJ Clayworth 17:01, 19 Jul 2004 (UTC)
 * I concur. Two external links with a two-word heading is definitely a "very short page with little or no definition or context". -- Cyrius|&#9998; 13:51, 22 Jul 2004 (UTC)
 * Roberdan's Blogs
 * Public: http://blogs.msdn.com/roberdan Private: http://roberdan.blogspot.com/
 * SharePoint Portal Server

-- Cyrius|&#9998; 13:51, 22 Jul 2004 (UTC) This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like other '/delete' pages is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion or on the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.