Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert A. Kindler


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Courcelles 00:09, 27 December 2010 (UTC)

Robert A. Kindler

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Person who's only claim to notability is working for a notable entity Wuh  Wuz  Dat  19:54, 13 December 2010 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles 00:30, 20 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep. From the Wall Street Journal legal blog: "Former Cravath M&A lawyer-cum-J.P. Morgan investment banker Robert Kindler made headlines this morning with news that he’s defected to Morgan Stanley, where he’ll become vice chairman of investment banking. The Financial Times calls it a 'poaching coup.'" If the WSJ says says somebody's  professional activities make headlines, they're pretty surely notable enough for Wikipedia. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 21:35, 13 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions.  -- Jclemens-public (talk) 03:23, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Keep "Global Head of Mergers and Acquisitions and Vice Chairman of Morgan Stanley" would sem sufficiently notable. This is not exactly just "working for a notable entity". That would be a correct description for an ordinary member of the staff, not one of the senior executives.    DGG ( talk ) 01:36, 20 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  -- -- Cirt (talk) 13:12, 20 December 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.