Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert Ballecer


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Michig (talk) 09:34, 4 March 2019 (UTC)

Robert Ballecer

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non notable person who fails WP:GNG and WP:BASIC. No clear achievemnts or contributions in any field, article is a simple biography. Doesn't appear to be notable per WP:ENT, fails all three tests. Rscottjensen (talk) 03:53, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 04:28, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 04:30, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 04:30, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. FallingGravity 09:35, 17 February 2019 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep. Significant coverage by The Mercury News, National Catholic Reporter, and PC Magazine, per the article's sources. FallingGravity 09:43, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep credible, independent sources establish notability. -- Willthacheerleader18 (talk) 14:04, 17 February 2019 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Vanamonde (Talk) 00:23, 25 February 2019 (UTC)


 *  Keep  I like to play the Devil's Advocate but was unable to find a reason to vote delete. While not particularly accomplished, Robert seems to have adequate news coverage to warrant notability, for now. PhobosIkaros   ✉  18:32, 25 February 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.