Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert Boone


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep, nomination withdrawn. —David Eppstein (talk) 18:50, 19 June 2010 (UTC)

Robert Boone

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Individual who fails WP:GNG - I can't find any significant coverage in reliable sources. Proposed deletion contested without comment. Claritas § 19:51, 9 June 2010 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:02, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 21:18, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions.  —David Eppstein (talk) 06:20, 13 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep Take another look. The article was bare-bones, but a little research reveals that his book was reviewed in the Chicago Tribune, and he personally recieved a White House award presented by the First Lady. I have added the info to the article. --MelanieN (talk) 02:28, 14 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Weak keep. Coverage is just about enough for WP:GNG, although I don't blame the nominator for not finding it. Alzarian16 (talk) 13:46, 15 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Keep: the article needs further information (e.g. bio), but author meets WP:N according to sources. Dewritech (talk) 11:49, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Good point. I just added a little biographical information; more would help. --MelanieN (talk) 14:14, 16 June 2010 (UTC)


 * Keep - There is enough here to give information on a published, reviewed author. Let's keep it in. Jusdafax  15:10, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep. From the other side of the Atlantic, I must admit to being pretty impressed by the Chicagoan of the Year. Surely that adds to his notability? --Technopat (talk) 00:20, 18 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep - looking at the source material now found, I can't claim to support deleting this any more. Claritas § 07:07, 18 June 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.