Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert Borwick, 1st Baron Borwick


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was keep. John254 00:08, 12 November 2007 (UTC)

Robert Borwick, 1st Baron Borwick

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Non notable peer. Not an encyclopedic article Princess Pea Face 23:52, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep, assuming he had seat in the House of Lords - may reconsider if not.--Vintagekits 00:00, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep - A peer of the United Kingdom, that alone makes him notable. Ben W Bell   talk  03:19, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep - I think this nominator needs to review our notability guidelines before any more AfDs are attempted.  AK Radecki Speaketh  03:57, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep. It's a rather weak article, in need of expansion, but clearly has presumed notability per WP:BIO through membership of the House of Lords. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 21:44, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep per WP:BIO - Kittybrewster  &#9742;  12:05, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep per all above. Johnbod 12:08, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep per all above. In addition I would say that the nominator of this AfD, who declares herself to want a socialist republic, has acted in bad faith and there is WP:COI. David Lauder 12:39, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
 * It may be partisan bad faith, and it may be disruptive, but it is not WP:COI. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 02:34, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep. Nobody is knighted that is not notable- this is a clear-cut case of more research required, and not a case of a lack of notability. Monsieurdl 17:01, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
 * (speedy!) Keep the sheer absurdity of this nomination is extraordinary. Biofoundationsoflanguage 17:56, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
 * It's snowing in here. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 02:34, 10 November 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.