Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert Bradbury (transhumanist)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. \ Backslash Forwardslash / (talk) 08:28, 4 September 2009 (UTC)

Robert Bradbury (transhumanist)

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

A nonnotable person with the only claim to glory is invention of a nonnotabe neologism (under afd now). The very fact that the only thing can describe him is "transhumanist" says it all. - Altenmann >t 14:34, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Let's see what is decided with Matrioshka brain and Jupiter brain. If the book is notable the author probably is too. Aymatth2 (talk) 01:11, 29 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Weak merge to Matrioshka brain, assuming that that is kept. I do not think that the ANSI C work is enough to warrant an article, though I could see an argument that it might be. He also founded the Aeiveos Corporation, and has served on the board of directors of the American Aging Association and Extropy Institute; none of these are really significant enough for WP:BIO, though. - 2/0 (cont.) 20:21, 29 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions.  -- Cyber cobra  (talk) 04:22, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete little evidence of any plausible notability, except one wildly speculative concept.   DGG ( talk ) 05:55, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. GS cites 11, 5. Has made no mark on mainstream science. Xxanthippe (talk) 07:01, 30 August 2009 (UTC).
 * Delete anything worth keeping could be merged to Matrioshka or Jupiter brain (which appear to be on track for "keep and merge"), although I frankly don't see anything here except maybe a reference. --Crusio (talk) 10:51, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.