Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert Cait


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Uncontested. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 16:29, 13 May 2016 (UTC)

Robert Cait

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The article doesn't really do anything to establish whether or not this person is notable. All it says is "He voiced *insert name here*" ad nauseum, followed by a list of the characters he voiced, which is entirely unsourced. There is literally nothing else about him in the article. Electric Burst (Electron firings)(Zaps) 12:47, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. GSS  (talk) 12:57, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. GSS  (talk) 12:57, 5 May 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete seems to fail WP:Bio for voice actors. No 'significant roles in multiple notable films, television shows, stage performances, or other productions,' no 'large fan base or a significant "cult" following' and no 'unique, prolific or innovative contributions to a field of entertainment'. EllsworthSchmittendorf (talk) 14:03, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
 * The mere having of roles, even a lot of roles, does not in and of itself confer an automatic WP:NACTOR pass on an actor who cannot be reliably sourced — but the only "reference" here is to the closing credits of one of his works (a primary source that cannot demonstrate notability per se). And on a ProQuest Canadian Newsstand Major Dailies search, I can't add anything else to improve the sourcing besides glancing namechecks of his existence in coverage of Married Life — and that's just not enough. Delete. Bearcat (talk) 17:34, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as not at all suggesting any applicable notability, I would've also considered PROD.. SwisterTwister   talk  05:17, 13 May 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.