Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert College International Model United Nations (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 06:43, 23 March 2023 (UTC)

Robert College International Model United Nations
AfDs for this article:


 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Previously deleted following a discussion in 2010 and speedily in 2012. I'm restarting it as a discussion in case anything has changed in the intervening decade, but I'm still not seeing anything that meets WP:GNG or WP:EVENT. There are no independent reliable sources cited on the page that provide any in-depth coverage of the subject, nor can I find any in an English-language search of Google. There are a few blogs and Model UN guides that refer to this event, but none are WP:RS. In the absence of reliable sources then the answer must be deletion. 49ersBelongInSanFrancisco (talk) 05:21, 16 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events, Education, Schools,  and Turkey. 49ersBelongInSanFrancisco (talk) 05:21, 16 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete and salt: I successfully found a CV for someone who participated in it once . I found a student news article about their delegation in the US to a conference, but that's about the club not the conference. This one's clear, and the article should be salted to avoid recreation. Nomader  ( talk ) 05:38, 16 March 2023 (UTC)


 * Redirect to Robert College: Furthermore, if one is to look at any MUN conferences on Wikipedia, there is not a page for any of them. So, I agree with 49ersBelongInSanFrancisco; but I think that salting is unnecessary and instead it should redirect to the relevant subtopic under the Robert College page. kdk (talk) 09:43, 16 March 2023 (UTC)
 * I suppose I could also feel that redirect to the college could be appropriate, but it feels like a very odd search term that would be rare (and people typing it would literally be typing in "Robert College" at the start of it already? Really the article Robert College shouldn't have a completely unsourced Model UN section in it either, and it's clear there's good reason that it's a delisted Good Article. There's just no significant coverage of this club and it takes a completely WP:UNDUE portion of the college article as it is here. Nomader  ( talk ) 01:59, 20 March 2023 (UTC)


 * Delete. Lacks notability and any secondary sources. Aintabli (talk) 22:56, 17 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete - and salt. As others have mentioned, there's no secondary sources. Salting is appropriate due to repeated disruptive recreation after deletion. 174.212.224.32 (talk) 20:10, 18 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete. The subject doesn’t meet WP:GNG. I would also suggest WP:SALT to avoid recreation. Shawn Teller (talk) 01:38, 23 March 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.