Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert Dale Rowell


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. RL0919 (talk) 10:51, 13 August 2021 (UTC)

Robert Dale Rowell

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Pavlov2 (talk) 06:20, 6 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. Curbon7 (talk) 06:59, 6 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. Curbon7 (talk) 06:59, 6 August 2021 (UTC)


 * Comment Well, the nomination is pleasingly brief and I've certainly seen less coherent ones. This seems to be the nominator's first visit to AfD so maybe a look at Deletion process would help. As a non Twinkle user myself, I'm disappointed rather than surprised that it handles null nominations. Thincat (talk) 08:44, 6 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Sorry for submit a null nomination, I nominate it because the issue "The topic of this article may not meet Wikipedia's general notability guideline" was hanged for a long time. Pavlov2 (talk) 11:20, 6 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Oh, I understand. I won't vote because, although I can't see why anyone would write this article, neither can I see it is worth troubling to delete it. Thincat (talk) 12:51, 6 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep The US justice system executes a depressingly large number of its clients, but at least it does so with copious, open and reliable publicity. This article is badly in need of inline citations; it may not be well-referenced, but it's certainly referencable. Crimes sufficiently awful to lead to execution also stand far enough out of the ordinary to be strongly notable, and are worthy of a historic record. Elemimele (talk) 11:13, 6 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep No explanation from nominator as to why this article should be deleted. References need inline citations which hopefully someone can do following the result of this AfD. Inexpiable (talk) 19:44, 6 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep - Per WP:GNG and Inexpiables rationale.BabbaQ (talk) 13:30, 8 August 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.