Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert Davis (author)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. No argument advanced for notability under WP:PROF, WP:AUTHOR, or WP:BASIC. j⚛e deckertalk 15:55, 5 September 2012 (UTC)

Robert Davis (author)

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

Non-notable author, fails WP:PROF and WP:WRITER. ukexpat (talk) 14:41, 29 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 18:28, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 18:29, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 18:29, 30 August 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete (I'm the 99 IP who initially tagged the article), per nom. Essentially a vanity piece that never ought to have passed AFC. Current concern is that a second account adding content is an alternate of the article's creator. 166.147.123.19 (talk) 19:30, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete. I agree that the standards for WP:PROF and WP:AUTHOR are not met based on the info the article, which appears quite extensive, so I doubt anything essential is missing. Tijfo098 (talk) 12:25, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete. Fails WP:AUTHOR, WP:BK, and WP:BIO. Qworty (talk) 22:58, 4 September 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.