Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert Downs


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. joe deckertalk to me 22:07, 26 September 2011 (UTC)

Robert Downs

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Prod removed by user said to be a marketing manager for the publisher. Prod concern was "No evidence that this author is notable in third party reliable sources. Book may be marginally notable, but author is not," and I do not feel that this has been addressed. This author does not meet WP:BIO. Fiftytwo thirty (talk) 20:32, 19 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete. The WP:AUTHOR part of WP:BIO is relevant here. We need claims from more than a marketing manager with promotional intent. ~Amatulić (talk) 21:00, 19 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Mexico-related deletion discussions.  — &mdash; alf.laylah.wa.laylah (talk) 03:50, 20 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  — &mdash; alf.laylah.wa.laylah (talk) 03:50, 20 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Speedy Delete as spam, and potential copyvio. See this amazon profile which is author submitted and reads identically to this article.  Even if cleared with appropriate license, it's still spam. -- Whpq (talk) 19:46, 20 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete. I can't find any evidence that he meets WP:AUTHOR or WP:GNG. Camerafiend (talk) 02:06, 22 September 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.