Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert Endeacott


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 22:13, 26 June 2017 (UTC)

Robert Endeacott

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Contested PROD by author. Laun  chba  ller  17:10, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  WC  Quidditch   &#9742;   &#9998;  21:38, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions.  WC  Quidditch   &#9742;   &#9998;  21:39, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions.  WC  Quidditch   &#9742;   &#9998;  21:39, 12 June 2017 (UTC)

Delete fails WP:AUTHOR in that although he appears to have written a couple of books they are not notable works and he has received no notable independent coverage outside run of mill book reviews. No other claim to notability Club Oranje T 03:48, 13 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone  17:55, 16 June 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete - no evidence of notability. GiantSnowman 09:35, 18 June 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Linguist 1 1 1 22:30, 19 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete - no reliable independent sources Spiderone  20:22, 23 June 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.