Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert F. LaPrade


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) buffbills7701 01:33, 29 May 2014 (UTC)

Robert F. LaPrade

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:BIO Person not noteworthy and reads like advertisement Quod erat demonstrandum 3.14159 (talk) 15:50, 21 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep: Sources seem noteworthy and reliable enough. There are a few weasel words but nothing that couldn't be simply removed to make it sound better. Macktheknifeau (talk) 15:56, 21 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Sure, sources can be noteworthy enough, but having lots of sources doesn't make a someone noteworthy. Lots of professionals are authors, researchers, editors, and heads of committees and associations, what distinguishes this one as notable enough for a WP page? Quod erat demonstrandum 3.14159 (talk) 16:03, 21 May 2014 (UTC)
 * See WP:A7 and Notability Guidelines. Quod erat demonstrandum 3.14159 (talk) 16:10, 21 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:41, 22 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:41, 22 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:41, 22 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:41, 22 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep. Passes WP:Prof. Xxanthippe (talk) 09:26, 22 May 2014 (UTC).
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.