Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert Farber (artist)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep under the snow clause (non-admin closure)  OxonAlex    - talk  15:26, 16 August 2019 (UTC)

Robert Farber (artist)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:ARTIST OrgoneBox (talk) 22:34, 12 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. OrgoneBox (talk) 22:34, 12 August 2019 (UTC)


 * Keep I have added sources that show that the subject meets the GNG: "has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject". Vexations (talk) 23:47, 12 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 01:17, 13 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 01:17, 13 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 01:17, 13 August 2019 (UTC)


 * Keep If the Victoria and Albert Museum and the Museum of Modern Art in NY think he is notable by placing him in their collections, he probably is. He also meets our WP:ARTIST 4d standard for several museums. Vexations and I have added many sources; there are now 14.ThatMontrealIP (talk) 03:27, 13 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep Plenty of references, death noted in The New York Times, art pieces in the collection of major museums, the subject of a major retrospective accompanied by a 70-page booklet about his art. This is a no-brainer. Pichpich (talk) 03:38, 13 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep - in fairness to the editor who sent this to AfD this was the state of the article when it was submitted. Under those circumstances, it probably could have even been speedied as not making a claim of notability. As it stands now, notability is not in question. ♟♙ (talk) 18:41, 13 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep Meets WP:ARTIST by having work in MoMA and V&A's collections. -Lopifalko (talk) 19:03, 13 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep Statements are reliably sourced. Barca (talk) 20:17, 13 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep as per WP:HEY the article clearly establishes him as a notable artist with significant coverage in multiple reliable sources Atlantic306 (talk) 21:05, 13 August 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.