Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert Fishman


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Cirt (talk) 10:50, 12 October 2009 (UTC)

Robert Fishman

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Fails to meet WP:Bio ShamWow (talk) 18:37, 5 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Fails WP:PROF.--JohnnyB256 (talk) 19:23, 5 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions.  —David Eppstein (talk) 07:07, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment. Looking at GS for Robert Fishman in the social anthropology area I find cites of 582, 335 ,110, 97, 86.. If these are credited to the correct Fishman (but I am not sure of this) then notability per WP:Prof #1 is attained easily. He also appears to be notable as an political activist. Xxanthippe (talk) 08:20, 6 October 2009 (UTC).
 * He was never more than an assistant professor. His work would hardly seem notable. His work as a political activist seems quite marginal and not significant enough to be included in Wikipedia.ShamWow (talk) 20:03, 6 October 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete. Borderline attack page with more about two combative incidents than about his academic career. WP:BIO and WP:BLP are more appropriate guidelines than WP:PROF for this material, but a Google news search found only minor local coverage. —David Eppstein (talk) 07:32, 7 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Who is attacking who? But if it is an attack then of course it should be Delete. Xxanthippe (talk).
 * The point seems to be to highlight his aggressive Zionist stance/actions. I'm not convinced that this constitutes an attack: Fishman might be proud of being characterized in this way and unconcerned that others might believe it reflects poorly on him.  But notability seems doubtful.  Nomoskedasticity (talk) 11:59, 7 October 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.