Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert G. Allen (author) (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Tone 19:43, 4 January 2010 (UTC)

Robert G. Allen (author)
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Entry is an advertisement and does not fulfill any purpose. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jadedtree (talk • contribs) 00:18, 6 December 2009 (UTC)

Note: I'm good-faith completing this incomplete nomination. It will be listed on the date seen in my signature, not the date the incomplete AFD was posted. tedder (talk) 07:53, 28 December 2009 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:14, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Utah-related deletion discussions.  -- tedder (talk) 07:55, 28 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  -- tedder (talk) 07:55, 28 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep. He is an important author in the real estate investing community, although probably not one of the best. John Reed's criticism of Robert Allen. I should note that I own several of Allen's books, including at least one not mentioned in the article. Tangurena (talk) 05:55, 29 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Keep An advertisement? The tone is not promotional. Does not fulfill any purpose? The purpose is to provide encyclopedic coverage of a prominent author. AfD is not for cleanup. Notability concerns are not raised, but because they were in the first AfD: The subject of this article meets WP:BIO easily; as a matter of fact, he has an entry at Gale Contemporary Authors. A Stop at Willoughby (talk) 01:29, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep Many mentions in NYT (including Best Seller lists ) .   Notable in spades. Collect (talk) 14:19, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep, should have been speedy keep. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 16:47, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.