Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert G. Williams


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. j⚛e deckertalk 16:37, 1 October 2014 (UTC)

Robert G. Williams

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This person is not notable per WP:ACADEMIC. Plus, the article is probably confusing people since there is another economist named Robert G. Williams who actually is a professor at Guilford College. I think we should delete the existing article. bender235 (talk) 17:32, 7 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions.  Jinkinson   talk to me  18:01, 7 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:34, 8 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:34, 8 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, j⚛e deckertalk 01:38, 15 September 2014 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  D u s t i *Let's talk!* 00:54, 22 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete He runs a business that puts out the articles that source him--clearly not independent. Running a business does not guarantee notability and there's certainly nothing to show he's a notable academic. 131.118.229.17 (talk) 23:39, 23 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete Of the three sources that are not his own site #1 (dadsnow) is not a reliable site (no "about", no info on who runs it); #4 the DHHS report, is 404; #5 does not mention him at all. LaMona (talk) 21:49, 30 September 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.