Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert Gagnon

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was delete. CDC  (talk)  22:59, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Robert Gagnon
Non-notable, probably about the author. Bart133 (t) 02:05, 4 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Delete, not notable. Firebug 01:28, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Joke by anon, one of a series. Andrewa 02:26, 4 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Someone has seriously underestimated the level of achievement necessary to be included in an encyclopedia. Average Earthman 13:25, 4 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * No doubt the same fellow involved in a number of articles here. Oh, well.  Enjoy the five days.  Delete as pure vanity. - Lucky 6.9 02:06, 8 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Somehow, this would have been less annoying if it were funny. Delete. Lacrimosus 08:17, 8 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Stupid joke/vandalism. &mdash; Brim 09:43, Feb 9, 2005 (UTC)
 * Comment: This was apparently either never listed on vfd or removed out of process, so I'm bringing it to today's page for resolution. &mdash;Korath (Talk) 00:33, Apr 14, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, not notable, vanity. Megan1967 07:31, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep FroggyMoore 15:58, 19 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.