Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert Gruenberg


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep per WP:SK. Nomination withdrawn with no delete !votes present. (Non-administrator closure.) Northamerica1000(talk) 08:38, 22 November 2013 (UTC)

Robert Gruenberg

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

WP:NN journalist. Could be a WP:CSD, but given the longevity of the article, thought best to take it here. Toddst1 (talk) 20:51, 20 November 2013 (UTC) Missed the mention of the pulitzer. (seriously jetlagged) Withdrawn. Toddst1 (talk) 07:14, 21 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:03, 20 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:03, 20 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:03, 20 November 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep. A Pulitzer Prize winner (as already noted in the article, which means A7 clearly would not apply).  Here is his obituary in the Washington Post. --Arxiloxos (talk) 00:39, 21 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep Pulitzer Prize winner, DC Bureau chief for a major Chicago paper, obit in the WaPo and ChiTri - seems enough to consider deleting might cause some harm. -- Green Cardamom (talk) 01:50, 21 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep. Next time, do a little checking WP:BEFORE. Clarityfiend (talk) 03:19, 21 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep The nominator rightly brings to our attention a poorly written and sourced article. However, the subject of the article is notable as an investigative journalist and he won a Pulitzer Prize among other prestigous awards. He had four decades of journalism to build a body of work that is worthy of attention. Crtew (talk) 05:38, 21 November 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.