Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert Gryn


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 22:14, 26 June 2017 (UTC)

Robert Gryn

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )


 * Delete Fails WP:BIO. On first inspection, the Forbes article looks like it meets the criteria for establishing notability. But then you see that it is really an interview and therefore not intellectually independent. None of the other sources meet the criteria either. -- HighKing ++ 18:07, 19 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:25, 19 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:25, 19 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Poland-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:25, 19 June 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete Having taken a second look at the Forbes article, the Forbes article is not very impressive, and seems to be based on an interview (perhaps the one that was published a bit later at ). The Business Insider it not a very in-depth treatment. He does get a decent amount of mentions in passing, including in English . Except few interviews (here's another one: ) and such mentions in passing, mostly related to his recent joining in the ranks of millionaires, there is nothing else I can find. Few interviews and no real in-depth treatment - WP:TOOSOON at best. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 06:46, 20 June 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.