Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert H. Eckel


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Nominator has withdrawn. (non-admin closure) Nihlus  21:54, 5 November 2017 (UTC)

Robert H. Eckel

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

BLP with no external references Rathfelder (talk) 20:13, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep as an endowed chair at a research university, he is a clear pass of PROF and since the subject is in the United States, the odds of not being able to find reliable sourcing for him are approximately zero. TonyBallioni (talk) 20:16, 5 November 2017 (UTC)


 * Keep I agree with Tony. Dysklyver  20:51, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions.  Dysklyver  20:53, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions.  Dysklyver  20:53, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions.  Dysklyver  20:53, 5 November 2017 (UTC)


 * Keep. A named professorial chair at a reputable university is an automatic pass of WP:PROF, as says. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 20:59, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep I have added more sources, he seems to easily pass WP:GNG and WP:PROF. Theroadislong (talk) 21:02, 5 November 2017 (UTC)


 * Happy to withdraw. Even eminent people have to comply with the BLP policy. Rathfelder (talk) 21:09, 5 November 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.