Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert H. Sperreng Middle School


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗ plicit  05:54, 11 June 2021 (UTC)

Robert H. Sperreng Middle School

 * – ( View AfD View log )

References in the list are not reliable and independent of the subject. Fails WP:NSCHOOL, WP:SIGCOV GermanKity (talk) 03:40, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. GermanKity (talk) 03:40, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. GermanKity (talk) 03:40, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. GermanKity (talk) 03:40, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 05:26, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Missouri-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 05:26, 4 June 2021 (UTC)


 * Merge to Lindbergh Schools (borderline speedy merge). BD2412  T 06:05, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete despite the misleading opening line of the article, this is a middle school and not a high school. For the American system we have decided that only true high schools are going to be given any sort of a pass from meeting the full requirements of organizational notability, although I think we have decided we need sourcing even for true high schools a little bit better than showing they exist. The sourcing here would probably not even work to keep it if it were a true high school, and as a middle school is is in no way adequate sourcing.John Pack Lambert (talk) 12:38, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete All the sources in the article are trivial, primary "about us" nonsense that doesn't do anything to establish the schools notability. Nothing I could was any better either. Just a few extremely trivial articles about a kid who goes there that won a spelling bee. Also, there's a name drop in a local history book. Which isn't enough on it's own to pass WP:GNG or more importantly anything else. As far as a merge is concerned, I'm against merging badly sourced content because it just degrades the quality of the merge target. So I don't think a good option in this case. --Adamant1 (talk) 09:08, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete trash sources. Sonofstar (talk) 20:42, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete sources are unreliable. 🍓⋆JennilyW♡🍧 (talk) 23:27, 7 June 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.