Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert Hess


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep.  MBisanz  talk 01:29, 13 April 2009 (UTC)

Robert Hess

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

PROD said there was no assertion of notability, nor 3rd party sources. However, I feel that there is an assertion of notability, and there are third party sources (one distinctly better than the other). -- Ged UK  10:46, 4 April 2009 (UTC) 
 * Keep: I find no compelling reason to delete this article. It's a squeaker, but the sources are reliable, the claims are referenced, and each of the subject's "media vehicles" return prominent search results, including books, websites, and the museum in Las Vegas. -- Oliver  Twisted (Talk) (Stuff) 11:04, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions.  -- — LinguistAtLarge • Talk  16:08, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep Some more information about his career in mixology, which seems to be his main claim to fame, would do better than the apparent resume of his work for Microsoft. -- BlueSquadron Raven  21:54, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –  Juliancolton  | Talk 00:04, 9 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep - I'd say he squeaks by notability guidelines. — LinguistAtLarge • Talk  04:49, 9 April 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.