Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert Jenkin


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 00:21, 5 October 2011 (UTC)

Robert Jenkin

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Clearly this page violates several rules and has misused purpose. The content for biography of living person is poorly sourced, where this single source points to single event. Data cannot be verify due to the lack of information about different point of view and the only single source does not conclude anything regarding this person, simply stating his name. So widespread definition simply forms a gossip WP:BLPGOSSIP.
 * Delete

On the other hand, the presence of repeated vandalism of the page shows that it's used primary for personal battlefield. The presence of personal conflict also violates the rules WP:BATTLEGROUND and creates event which later others can quote Wikipedia. To hold somebody a grudges is not a reason for creating biography page in Wikipedia and use it's influence as encyclopedical content back against the person.

Person is relatively unknown and the one single source, which can be misread, can affect a person's reputation, future personal and business life WP:NPF. Page is also to be considered as long-term abuse and attack to individual based on personal grudges. Perfectford (talk) 19:54, 24 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions.  — &mdash; alf.laylah.wa.laylah (talk) 01:54, 26 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete fails WP:GNG. Stuartyeates (talk) 07:58, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, v/r - TP 02:15, 28 September 2011 (UTC)




 * Delete as lacking clearly sourced claims of notability. This is exactly the sort of character assassination our BLP policies are supposed to prevent. Mangoe (talk) 03:18, 28 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Note to closing admin I was contacted on IRC to help User:Perfectford list this AFD in the log. It appears I listed it in the wrong log and that has caused some confusion.  I relisted the debate so it can run it's full course.  Admin User:King of Hearts closed the debate after seeing it relisted and seeing consensus to delete.  Not his fault, but the debate had not run it's full course.  I undid the closure, left a note on his talk page, and undeleted the article.  Please don't close debate until after 1 October at 19:54 GMT.--v/r - TP 14:23, 28 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete. Totally fails WP:GNG. -- P 1 9 9 • TALK 17:13, 28 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete. Fails WP:GNG. - DonCalo (talk) 19:30, 28 September 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.