Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert Kramer


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. It broke my heart, but User:Rebelguys2's argument, combined with weight of numbers, just about does it. fuddlemark (fuddle me!) 07:47, 31 January 2006 (UTC)

Robert Kramer
Some assertion of notability, but not enough. Esprit15d 19:24, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as no verifiable proof of meeting WP:BIO. Stifle 00:47, 22 January 2006 (UTC)

'This AfD is being relisted to generate a clearer consensus. Please add new discussion below this notice. Thanks!' Johnleemk | Talk 14:07, 25 January 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete nn-bio. --Terence Ong 14:43, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep. He's listed in Amazon as having a catalog, but there is no further information given.  Still, the material in the article seems to be verified by what they have listed. .  --DDG 16:09, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
 * keep Listings on amazon,allmusic. association with Napoleon Murphy Brock is good enough. MNewnham 16:16, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. It seems like the closest this guy meets Notability (music) is the "two or more albums" clause. However, Dimension One is hardly a "major label or one of the more important indie labels". Association with a notable person, as per MNewnham's argument, should not make this guy notable. Delete. -Rebelguys2 19:13, 25 January 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.