Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert Lambton


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was '''I have deleted this article, as the notability is marginal, and the subject requests deletion. These two in conjunction would seem to allow us to do the right thing here.'''. M er cury   13:28, 28 November 2007 (UTC)

Robert Lambton
I declined the speedy deletion request because the subject clearly makes an assertion of notability. However, I don't think that the subject is notable for Wikipedia. The subject is mentioned in a few reliable sources (newspapers), but I fail to see where Lambton has been the main subject of an entire reliable source. Nishkid64 (talk) 18:40, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
 * This was put up for speedy deletion and declined as notability confirmed. I would agree and would not wish for it to be deleted.Paste (talk) 18:38, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Answer given here. Nishkid64 (talk) 18:53, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep as it's still under construction, per the talk page. Bearian&#39;sBooties (talk) 01:48, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
 * There's not much more he can add, given the lack of resources on the subject available on the Internet. My point was never about the actual amount of content, but rather the lack of notability per WP:BIO. Nishkid64 (talk) 02:02, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
 * The article needs to assert notability. Saying it is under construction does not assert notability. Vegaswikian (talk) 23:08, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Article should be deleted considering the subject has now requested that it is on the articles talk page!Paste (talk) 18:04, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
 * That's nice, but it does not matter. If he is notable the article should remain. Vegaswikian (talk) 23:08, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
 * It does matter — see Biographies of living persons and arguably an application of " do no harm ".  Daniel  11:38, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. Fails WP:BIO and WP:RS.  Vegaswikian (talk) 23:08, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per Vegaswikian and WP:BLP1E. -- Jeandré, 2007-11-28t09:36z
 * Strong delete, extremely marginal notability combined with subject request.  Daniel  11:39, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. Article about a minor of no great notability who wishes the article deleted. WjBscribe 11:40, 28 November 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.