Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert Lethbridge


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Keep Computerjoe 's talk 09:47, 30 May 2006 (UTC)

Robert Lethbridge
Professor fails to qualify as notable. He's made it up the hierarchy, but no indication of coming up with any new ideas or saying anything special. Andjam 15:11, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep because of the positions he holds/has held. Tyrenius 18:31, 25 May 2006 (UTC)

Yeah, I say keep him too. first of all he's a nice guy, and second, as a master of a cambridge college and the holder of such distinguished awards, he deserves a place on wikipedia... --131.111.226.61 19:09, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
 * IP address comes from Cambridge, has edited Cambridge-related articles. Andjam 03:38, 27 May 2006 (UTC)


 * Weak Delete - While he does have many papers, I don't see what unique contributions he has that makes him particularly notable. Niceness does not make for notability.Wickethewok 19:12, 25 May 2006 (UTC)


 * Keep He's one of the only people to write a criticism of Zola in English, plus look him up on google scholar http://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&lr=&q=%22robert+lethbridge%22&btnG=Search --Pjmc 20:58, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment altered by author after timestamp Andjam 08:56, 27 May 2006 (UTC). Author tried to hide revision  Andjam 09:15, 27 May 2006 (UTC)


 * Keep he's master of a cambridge college Bwithh 05:36, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Shouldn't notability be based on what they have done, rather than what titles they have obtained? Andjam 03:33, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. Professor emeritus from the University of London, Master of a Cambridge college - the relevant parts of Academia seems to think he is notable, who am I to disagree? Judging from the Google Books search results, he is a leading Zola scholar. up+land 08:38, 26 May 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.