Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert Lifmann


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 05:07, 23 February 2022 (UTC)

Robert Lifmann

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Fails the revised inclusion guidelines for WP:NCRIC as his appearances were only in the ICC Trophy. Can't see much in the way of other sources to establish wider WP:GNG. StickyWicket (talk) 21:32, 8 February 2022 (UTC) Relisting comment: Previously nominated via WP:PROD, ineligible for soft deletion. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  00:02, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. StickyWicket (talk) 21:32, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Cricket-related deletion discussions. StickyWicket (talk) 21:32, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Netherlands-related deletion discussions. StickyWicket (talk) 21:32, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails the updated cricket guidelines. An internet search does bring up a few hits, but I'm not sure there's enough for a GNG pass. There may be something in Wisden on his about his ICC Trophy performances though. As he played in two tournaments, I'm not sure there's a suitable redirect per WP:ATD here. Rugbyfan22 (talk) 20:03, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete. In Delpher, his participation in games and results are actually covered extensively, well beyond an occasional international tourneer. That said, I did not see any in depth coverage. gidonb (talk) 21:52, 19 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep. Meets WP:NCRIC as played in an ICC Trophy final in 1986. Did the nominator read the article? They need to familiarise themselves with cricket notability guidelines. 2405:6E00:2689:B264:4984:2052:578B:2489 (talk) 00:01, 21 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment. Hardly notable as a standalone though is it, does nothing to satisfy GNG does it. And having looked up your IP location, if you're the user I think you are, sign up again. I was never a fan of what happened to you and thought you were a great editor. StickyWicket (talk) 19:21, 21 February 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.