Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert M. Lambert


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Speedy delete: copyright violation, advertising and questionable notability.. Pascal.Tesson (talk) 19:27, 12 March 2009 (UTC)

Robert M. Lambert

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)


 * Delete nn artist fails WP:CREATIVE Mayalld (talk) 15:26, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete I was in the process of deleting as G11 - Blatant Advertisement, when the AfD notice was posted and I mistakenly accepted the deletion reason as this AfD (obviously too new). I don't see the need for AfD as it is clearly advertisement to me. I see no indication of notability either. Now we have an AfD, so let it run its course. Cheers. -- Alexf(talk) 17:06, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment sent to AfD because its already been recreated once. Mayalld (talk) 17:09, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment actually, just spotted its a copyvio! Mayalld (talk) 17:16, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Recreation of a deleted article has never stopped me from nominating for speedy again. In my experience an article that's speedy deleted 3 times gets WP:SALT but I'm not sure if that's a rule/policy or not (most give up after 2 speedy deletions). Anyways, speedy delete per WP:CSD, G11, etc. KuyaBriBri Talk 17:23, 12 March 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.