Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert McCulloch (priest)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Keep. Those who have reviews the sources, including one editor who had previously opined "Delete" agree that they are sufficient to support notability. Eluchil404 (talk) 09:32, 18 February 2012 (UTC)

Robert McCulloch (priest)

 * – ( View AfD View log )


 * Delete. Does not meet notability standards. Sounds like an admirable priest, but still, an ordinary one. Thousands, if not tens of thousands, of priests have done similar things. Student7 (talk) 13:56, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete? Per Student7. Also the three on-line references don't qualify as establishing wp:notability.   The question mark is because the 4th reference is off line and the title looks more independent and I did not review it. North8000 (talk) 15:16, 10 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep We should keep it temporarily, at least to attempt to verify the book with Booksources. Yutsi Talk/  Contributions  16:09, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Grahame (talk) 00:59, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Support above for keep till verification. -- lTopGunl (talk) 13:41, 12 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete I can find nothing in the article or in the sources cited that indicates notability. As said above, an admirable priest, but being admired is not the same as notability. Emeraude (talk) 11:09, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 01:05, 12 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 01:06, 12 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 01:06, 12 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete Keep Per Student7. Changed vote per sources provided by Darkness Shines. Tradedia (talk) 17:47, 17 February 2012 (UTC)
 * KeepInternational News NetworkBusiness Recorderpolitics.co.ukThe Irish CatholicAgenzia FidesKatholiek NieuwsbladThe Catholic Weekly (AUS)The NationThe Southern CrossUCA NewsThe News InternationalABC Darkness Shines (talk) 01:13, 17 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep Per sources provided by Darkness Shines. Notability proven and verified. Mar4d (talk) 16:05, 17 February 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.