Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert Model


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗ plicit  00:03, 9 January 2022 (UTC)

Robert Model

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

This businessman doen't appear to pass WP:ANYBIO, with neither his business activities nor his family connections sufficient claims of notability. The closest thing to significant coverage I could find is this short article about his wedding, but it reads like routine coverage of a high society wedding and provides very little information on the subject himself. Lennart97 (talk) 19:28, 1 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Lennart97 (talk) 19:28, 1 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Connecticut-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:33, 1 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Wyoming-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:33, 1 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment because of his business positions he can be notable but I can't find any SIGCOV in RS. Also his last name (Model), is the reason of not finding any SIGCOV. If others find significant coverage, my idea is Keep, otherwise Delete. Brayan ocaner (talk) 22:16, 1 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete. I don't think any of his business positions make him particularly notable. I'm also struggling to find much significant coverage of his business achievements. However, I did find a bit more info on him, which may help others in making a decision.  The CBS article could go some way to providing notability, but for me it's not quite enough. MarchOfTheGreyhounds (talk) 11:47, 3 January 2022 (UTC)


 * Thank you for locating these sources. I agree with your assessment that they don't quite constitute significant coverage but they're definitely useful. Lennart97 (talk) 12:24, 3 January 2022 (UTC)


 * Delete Google books and newspapers.com didn't return any hits. Surely a significant past figure, should have something in these sources. MartinWilder (talk) 03:19, 4 January 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.