Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert Omeljaniuk

 This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Sjakkalle (Check!)  07:33, 16 September 2005 (UTC)

Robert Omeljaniuk
Vanity page; check what links here for vandalism references but Computer and Video Games is one I'm about to revert. Coll7 03:52, 8 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Check his contributions -- When I dug deeper I found various vandalism posts, may be hassling Sasquatch for having reverted him. Coll7 04:24, 8 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Ashish Vyas is another vanity/vandalism article from the same URL. OK, I think I've summed it up! Coll7 04:33, 8 September 2005 (UTC)
 * No way! Robert Omeljaniuk is an important man in our time and place!  I dont' know about Ashish Vyas or Sasquatch but let RO's entry flourish into what it should and will be. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.113.154.197 (talk • contribs) 02:14, September 8, 2005
 * The comments by this anon appear consistent with the possibility that this is some kind of troll.---CH (talk) 06:44, 12 September 2005 (UTC)


 * Speedy Delete under new criteria, no assertion of notability made. --InShaneee 07:09, 8 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Robert's Credentials
 * Teaching Assistant []
 * Professor [] — Preceding unsigned comment added by 204.155.226.2 (talk • contribs) 11:10, September 8, 2005
 * That professor is clearly a completely different person to the teaching assistant - they just happen to have the same name. So I don't trust your research whatsoever. Average Earthman 21:52, 8 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Looks to me like someone is very clumsily trolling us Wikipedians.---CH (talk) 06:44, 12 September 2005 (UTC)


 * Delete. This article makes some claims which, if true, would be reasons for notability, so IMO CSD A7 (nn-bios) does not apply. Specifically inventing the concept of a "back end" would be highly notable. However i don't belive those claims, and without them this is a clearly non-notable person. Might be subject to a speedy as vandalism, but I would prefer not to go there. DES (talk) 15:52, 8 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Strong Deleteor Speedy if possible as complete nonsense... though I do like how the Author has stated credentials here as a TA of Psychology at Colombia and a Professorship of Biology at Lakehead... pretty good for someone who claims to be a DB pioneer.--Isotope23 17:18, 8 September 2005 (UTC)
 * This entry shouldn't be deleted. No no no.  I happen to know for a fact that Robert Omeljaniuk of Hoboken, NJ was a PIONEER in the field of large-scale litigation database maintenance, design, and support. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.18.0.210 (talk • contribs) 12:01, September 8, 2005
 * I for one am rapidly concluding that you, anon, are a troll.---CH (talk) 06:44, 12 September 2005 (UTC)


 * Delete - vanity - T&#949;x  &#964;  ur&#949;  21:41, 8 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Overblown hyperbole with no citations or evidence to back up the claims. Average Earthman 21:52, 8 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete Ho hum.... Marcus22 14:44, 9 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete nn vanity resume cruft, plus nonverifiable, possible hoax, plus suggestions of trolling ---CH (talk) 06:37, 12 September 2005 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.