Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert R. Peacock


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 11:26, 25 December 2015 (UTC)

Robert R. Peacock

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Biography, sourced entirely to raw tables of election results but for a single news article in which he's a namecheck and not the subject, of a person notable only as a non-winning candidate for political office. This is not a claim of notability that passes WP:NPOL — if you cannot make a credible and properly sourced claim that the topic was already notable enough for a Wikipedia article for some other reason before they became a candidate, then they do not become notable enough for a Wikipedia article until they win the election. Delete. Bearcat (talk) 19:51, 2 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 20:23, 2 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Jersey-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:50, 3 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:50, 3 December 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete as I see no better convincing notability. SwisterTwister   talk  06:05, 4 December 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, KTC (talk) 00:45, 10 December 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kharkiv07  ( T ) 00:03, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete, never won any elections, no sources except for election statistics.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:09, 25 December 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.