Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert Ransom, Jr.


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was keep and cleanup. J- ſtan ContribsUser page 01:05, 15 January 2008 (UTC)

Robert Ransom, Jr.

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

User keeps placing original research material that is not sourced with verifiable references.

Cross AfD: Armistead L. Long‎, Charles S. Venable‎, Archibald C. Godwin‎, Cullen A. Battle‎, Robert D. Johnston, David G. McIntosh‎, Montgomery D. Corse, Robert Ransom, Jr., and James B. Walton‎  - Jameson L. Tai  talk  ♦  contribs   08:24, 6 January 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep needs to be cleaned up but subject is notable. I checked the other articles and the users contribution history, it's possible they are posting copyrighted material and don't know that. Awotter (talk) 08:41, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment These all smell like copyvios, especially the formatting. This one is probably from Sifakis per its own citation, a 1989 book that is still under copyright for some time to come. --Dhartung | Talk 09:48, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment Since one of the other articles used different references I am not sure yet, I could find no matches in Google books and several of the articles seem to have a fair number of misspelled words, so it still could be someone just not aware of the problems with the articles or waht copyvio is. I posted a message on the users page along with an example of what a cleaned up article should look like James B. Walton and a link to Wiki Military Project. Awotter (talk) 12:04, 6 January 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep and cleanup, notable as Civil War general. NawlinWiki (talk) 19:52, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep - significant coverage in reliable sources Addhoc (talk) 20:57, 14 January 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.