Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert Redfern (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  Sandstein  18:08, 3 February 2012 (UTC)

Robert Redfern
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log )

Dubious notability; what appears to be unreliable and/or primary sources; may fail WP:BIO. (Please do not CSD as recreation of AfD material, as the previous AfD was closed as speedy deletion) ZZArch  talk to me 20:27, 26 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Health and fitness-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 01:59, 27 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 01:59, 27 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete The references in the article are a blog/PR mix; I'm not seeing any there that meet WP:RS. Similarly, searches on Google and other sites are not turning up anything substantial to demonstrate notability. AllyD (talk) 20:36, 27 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment: Please see this related SPI case page. Amalthea  12:59, 28 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete - No coverage in reliable sources. Sourcing in the article does not represent reliable sources. -- Whpq (talk) 15:45, 31 January 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.