Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert Rosenfeld


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Delete per policies such as WP:NOTE and WP:BIO.. &mdash; Anonymous Dissident  Talk 08:57, 22 September 2008 (UTC)

Robert Rosenfeld

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Article is written by the subject's company, so obvious conflict is present. The sole reference on the article is the official site that he is affilated with. CyberGhostface (talk) 03:42, 17 September 2008 (UTC)

Please tell me how this entry differs from any of the following entries:

Maureen Lipman Donald Trump Rafi Zabor

I would be glad to rewrite the article, but am not sure how it represents a conflict of interests. It is a factual account of a person who was born in 1946. I have added several references to other sites and am not an employee of the subject's company. If the article is rewritten with additional external references, will that suffice? firesidetruth 04:31, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
 * You're not sure how it's a conflict of interest? Well, for starters, the user who wrote it User:Innovating also happens to be the name of the website that Robert works on. And I have to wonder how neutral you are all in all this, as it appears you're a single-purpose account who just registered the other day and has only edited Robert's article.--CyberGhostface (talk) 12:48, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
 * This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 14:46, 17 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom, WP:NOTE and WP:BIO Themfromspace (talk) 19:38, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:05, 18 September 2008 (UTC)
 * I'd be glad to rewrite the article to better reflect a more neutral point of view. This person also holds a few patents which can be found at the uspto.gov site and has accolades from business leaders such as Don Hall Jr. of Hallmark.  I don't think knowing a person and understanding web technology would make my factual accounting any less neutral.  What are the determining factors for Notarity?  I think people who are trying to make a difference in the world deserve a listing in a free encyclopedia that anyone can edit.  I respect the desire for standards and will do what I can to revise the text and references over the next couple of days.  How long do I have before a determination is made?  I was able to add those references last night with just a few Google searches and can find more I am sure.  Once I've have finished this process I will have a better understanding of the Wiki way and may be able to provide assistance on other posts.firesidetruth 04:08, 18 September 2008 (UTC)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Firesidetruth (talk • contribs)
 * Delete in the absence of references to notability. The single book he wrote is self-published, and found in no libraries except the Xerox corporate library, that of his employer. DGG (talk) 15:41, 18 September 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.