Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert Shaw (poet)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus.  Sandstein  08:20, 23 April 2019 (UTC)

Robert Shaw (poet)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not seeing significant coverage of this poet and musician. Tacyarg (talk) 10:45, 2 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Tacyarg (talk) 10:49, 2 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Tacyarg (talk) 10:49, 2 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Tacyarg (talk) 10:49, 2 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Poetry-related deletion discussions. Ceethekreator (talk) 10:53, 2 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep. Satisfies WP:BIO, WP:POET.-- P A T H S L O P U   ( T A L K ) 08:59, 3 April 2019 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 07:58, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Comment The citations on this article seem to be divided into two camps: those where Robert Shaw was involved in the production of the citation and those that don't mention Robert Shaw but rather connect to claims the article itself makes concerning Robert Shaw. Almost all of the edits by the original creator of the article are for this page or pages that relate to Robert Shaw, which would not be a problem in itself if the page could back up more of its claims with evidence. I'm sure the article could be made to satisfy WP:POET, but it looks like the page would require extensive archival work; I could see the page getting moved to a draft until then. Userqio (talk) 23:30, 9 April 2019 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 04:15, 16 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Comment Possibly Move to draft Some industrious Wikipedian needs to improve the layout and readability of this article. And then I can vote.  Lubbad85   (☎) 20:01, 16 April 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.