Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert T. Rhode


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete per consensus and as a poorly sourced BLP per WP:BLP. Ron Ritzman (talk) 12:54, 12 October 2010 (UTC)

Robert T. Rhode

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Non-notable author. Originally proposed for deletion as an unreferenced BLP, the PROD was removed after two very questionable references were added by a new user who has made no other contributions. The references (one to the minutes of a private club, which does not meet the requirements of verifiablity and one to Volume 3 of Discover published in 2010, which, if it is Discover magazine, would not have published volume 3 in 2010. Attempts to contact the new user to clarify these references have gone unanswered.  WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 19:28, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:49, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:49, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete -as per nom. Fails at WP:AUTHOR. --Kudpung (talk) 20:36, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete in the absence of evidence of passing WP:PROF. "Discover" appears to be the alumni magazine of his employer, not the famous one. —David Eppstein (talk) 05:37, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.