Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert Terell


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗ plicit  09:43, 1 June 2021 (UTC)

Robert Terell

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Fails WP:GNG no indepth coverage Urartuvanking (talk) 08:12, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Urartuvanking (talk) 08:12, 25 May 2021 (UTC)


 * Keep Has indepth coverage in major music websites, ,  and more which passes GNG. Thrueli (talk) 08:26, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
 * thehypemagazine.com literally has a page stating the prices for buying articles. All the sources you mention are paid garbage.--- Possibly (talk) 08:42, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
 * The Hype Magazine is a well known music website and there are many other indepth sources too which can counted for notability. Thrueli (talk) 09:14, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Sure, except thehypemagazine.com is not not the site for The Hype Magazine, which you skillfully piped.--- Possibly (talk) 15:57, 25 May 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete the sourcing here is very poor. "Droid Journal," for example, has the text "Marketing1on1 | Internet Marketing | SEO" at the bottom of the page." looking at another that Thrueli cites, freshheadline.com, I got caught in en endless loop of pages called "Top 50 Affordable Online Trade Schools". Freshheadline.com also cites no physical address on their cite. In short: paid junk. --- Possibly (talk) 08:37, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Maybe you are right that some of the sources are not much good but others like, , , , etc seems fine and coverage the subject indepth. Thrueli (talk) 09:01, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:29, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:29, 25 May 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete "Rocstar Music Group-RMG seeks to help indie artists grow a successful music brand in a different way!" The sources are all breathlessly paid for! Best Alexandermcnabb (talk) 10:32, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete nothing but blackhat SEO, vanity spam. YODADICAE👽  15:31, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete He's great at self-promotion, but these sources are not reliable. Walter Görlitz (talk) 17:08, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete - not enough in-depth coverage from independent, reliable source to pass WP:GNG.  Onel 5969  TT me 22:02, 30 May 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.