Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert V. Maraist


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. The Bushranger One ping only 17:46, 12 June 2012 (UTC)

Robert V. Maraist

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

Despite a prod, three editors have made no effort to provide evidence. &mdash; Sgroupace (talk) 17:42, 5 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Weak delete. I believe the governing standard is WP:SOLDIER and I am not sufficiently familiar with American military terminology to understand whether #6, "Commanded a substantial body of troops in combat", applies to his command; the definition of "substantial" is unclear to me.  I note, however, that this seems to be the only possible qualification for notability and, whatever the case, his command lasted for approximately one month and he may have been an administrative-type officer who presided over the unit's demise.  As noted by the nominator, there is no evidence to indicate that anyone has ever thought he was notable.  Ubelowme (talk) 18:46, 5 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Try #3 instead! -- Necrothesp (talk) 17:40, 6 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep General officers are presumed to be notable according to WP:SOLDIER.  Cullen 328  Let's discuss it  19:39, 5 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Reluctant keep. I consider being a (brigadier) general about as useless as one Major League Baseball game appearance being sufficient, but what can you do? Here's one minor article about him, and another about his part in a North African battle. There's also this document about his post-war Civil Defense work. Clarityfiend (talk) 19:44, 5 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 01:20, 6 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 01:22, 6 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep. General officers and divisional commanders are generally presumed to be notable per WP:COMMONSENSE (and WP:SOLDIER, although that's not actually policy). -- Necrothesp (talk) 17:38, 6 June 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.