Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert W. Wood (attorney)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. J04n(talk page) 02:29, 1 May 2013 (UTC)

Robert W. Wood (attorney)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Completing nomination on behalf of anonymous editor 50.136.156.75, whose rationale was posted on the article's talk page and is included below verbatim. On the merits, I have no opinion. UltraExactZZ Said~ Did 13:00, 24 April 2013 (UTC)

This page should be deleted because it is autobiography, not notable, and violates the conflict of interest policy. There is a conflict of interest because the page was originally written by Chris Welsch, an employee of Robert W. Wood, during his employment. Also, the list of awards is clearly promotional. Robert W. Wood is not notable because he is not the subject of any biography, nor has he made any enduring contribution to the legal field. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.136.156.75 (talk) 22:47, 23 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  czar   &middot;   &middot;  15:20, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  czar   &middot;   &middot;  15:20, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions.  czar   &middot;   &middot;  15:21, 24 April 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete. Lacks reliable independent secondary sources to establish notability as required by WP:GNG.  Googling turned up nothing useful.  Msnicki (talk) 15:28, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete I concur that notability is not established and GNG is not presented.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 18:01, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete Notability fail. Silverwood (talk) 21:04, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete - No significant coverage in reliable sources to establish notability. —  Joaquin008  ( talk ) 13:37, 26 April 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.