Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert of basevorn


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. -- ( drini's vandalproof page &#x260E;  ) 18:06, 26 November 2005 (UTC)

Robert of basevorn
Appears to be original reasearch, written in the form of a paper, reads like ORjfg284 you were saying? 17:17, 19 November 2005 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom jfg284 you were saying? 17:17, 19 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Removing vote, replacing with no vote. The author has cited sources, making it not really original research any more, and improved formatting to make it read less like a paper.  It looks like he was bothered to take that scythe and trim it.  Still not sure if it fits relevancy, because 14th centruy isn't so much my field, per se.  Would vote keep other than this relevancy problem, now.jfg284 you were saying? 15:54, 22 November 2005 (UTC)


 * Delete original research, unless someone can be bothered to take a scythe to it and trim it down to a proper article. Just zis Guy, you know? [T]/[C] (W) AfD? 18:33, 19 November 2005 (UTC)
 * delete as per JzG Pete.Hurd 07:24, 22 November 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.