Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roberta Quimby


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__ to Ramona (novel series). ✗ plicit  23:42, 15 May 2023 (UTC)

Roberta Quimby

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Minor character mentioned in one book of a children's series. No notability on her own as far as I can tell. The description of her is also very in-universe which is not what the Wikipedia is for.Jaguarnik (talk) 21:35, 8 May 2023 (UTC)

I am also nominating the following related pages because [similar lack of notability]:

Jaguarnik (talk) 21:42, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 21:43, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete. All the coverage about her that I found are trivial mentions. Does not seem to pass WP:GNG. Tutwakhamoe (talk) 22:08, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Merge All into a new Quimby Family article covering both the notable and NN characters, redirecting individual character names into the new article. Or, if you prefer a List of Ramona Quimby series characters or something like it. While it appears likely these don't need to exist as standalone articles, there are multiple ATDs preferable to outright deletion. Jclemens (talk) 23:18, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
 * There is a section about the characters in Ramona (novel series); I don't see that these articles need to exist as standalone articles, maybe an entire Quimby Family article is possible but I do not believe that's the best solution.Jaguarnik (talk) 00:20, 9 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Redirect All to Ramona (novel series) - It looks like a pretty sufficient character list already exists at the series' article. Its pretty clear that none of these three nominated characters are notable enough to warrant individual articles, but redirecting to the existing list to aid in searches is a pretty obvious WP:ATD. Rorshacma (talk) 19:21, 11 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Ah, that does look like a better target, thanks! Jclemens (talk) 02:26, 12 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Redirect or selectively merge per Rorshacma. None of the characters have enough coverage for a stand-alone article, but there is a clear place where they are already covered, per WP:ATD. Shooterwalker (talk) 00:08, 15 May 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.