Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roberto Aiello (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 08:10, 17 June 2010 (UTC)

Roberto Aiello
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Declining speedy - looks like it might make it this time. Let's discuss. UtherSRG (talk) 09:44, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions.  -- UtherSRG (talk) 09:46, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - sources given do not establish notability of the person. For example, the five questions interview is about ultra-wideband technology. Thus, he might deserve some mention or citation in the appropriate article, but not his own.--137.122.49.102 (talk) 14:36, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep - the EETimes article is about him Intervalhistory (talk) 18:16, 3 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment Okay, the EETimes article appears to be reliable and provide significant coverage, are there any other sources which provide significant coverage that aren't already listed in the article? VernoWhitney (talk) 19:27, 3 June 2010 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   06:12, 10 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete It still falls short of notability and seems promotional in regards to the subject. --Stormbay (talk) 03:29, 4 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Delete Fails WP:GNG and WP:BIO. Only a single reliable source with significant coverage, not multiple sources. VernoWhitney (talk) 10:21, 10 June 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.