Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roberto Cappuccio


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 11:30, 20 May 2006 (UTC)

Roberto Cappuccio
Being the author of a minor free software program does not make you notable. Delete — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sc4 (talk • contribs)
 * Comment: I don't know enough about software to make a determination here, but at the time I write this, the nominator's account has made only three edits, all of them connected to this AFD nomination. As such, I suspect bad faith, or at least a hidden agenda. -Hit bull, win steak(Moo!) 16:48, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Yes, I'm really a Linux-hating Windows-loving zealot. Not. WP:FAITH. Sc4 20:47, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Do you want to offer an explanation as to why you have no other edits in your history? -Hit bull, win steak(Moo!) 22:58, 15 May 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete regardless there is no real content to the article. Were a properly constructed article created with notable bio-graphical details AND this person had notoriety to begin with maybe. --Crossmr 17:24, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete, as the article subject (and creator, and probable only real editor) has proposed the article for deletion. .  I'm removing the prod tag as it's inappropriate with an AfD going on, but the dif shows he did request it.  Mango juice talk 05:23, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete, personally I think there is no need for my biography to be in Wikipedia yet. Please delete this article. --Rcappuccio 08:57, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
 * delete - no meat to this—can't really be called an article, and notibility is also in question as mentioned above. Vegalo 11:58, 17 May 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.