Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roberto Pinotti


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. being interviewed doesn't make you notable and some decent sourcing is required to make this notable. Since these haven't been put forward the outcome is clear Spartaz Humbug! 03:56, 8 January 2011 (UTC)

Roberto Pinotti

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Seems to fail WP:BIO. An author and a journalist, to be sure, but not one of note. Most sources are to vanity sites. jps (talk) 15:58, 24 December 2010 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:51, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Paranormal-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:33, 24 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:33, 24 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep He is an important author in Italy. He was interviewn by History Channel regarding the discovery of Nostradamus Vaticinia codex. --REDTURTLE 16:32, 26 December 2010 (UTC)... Pinotti in RAI-3 (National Television) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Giancarlo Rossi (talk • contribs)
 * Can you point to some good independent sources that we can use to establish this and write an article? Interviews on credulous History Channel "documentaries" don't really cut it. See WP:FRINGE. jps (talk) 23:04, 27 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Keep per REDTURTLE. History Channel is easily found, meeting WP:Author.  CPerked (talk) 05:05, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.