Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robi Ludwig (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 09:44, 18 January 2020 (UTC)

Robi Ludwig
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Previously deleted. (Speedy candidate?) Weak sourcing. As a doctor, not a substantial contributor to her art. Reads like a resume, clearly promotional. Mikeblas (talk) 07:01, 11 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 07:07, 11 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 12:12, 11 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New Jersey-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 12:15, 11 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 12:15, 11 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 12:15, 11 January 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete nothing even close to passing academic notability, does not pass GNG, and the article is way too prmotional for WIkipedia. The last in theory could be remedied, but in the process we would probably end up with nothing.John Pack Lambert (talk) 06:40, 12 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:GNG just like the first time. Promotional article created by an SPA. Best, GPL93 (talk) 20:45, 12 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Speedy? Since this is recreated content (see WP:G4), for one. And the original AfD nomination says something about OTRS, whatever that is ... the link is password protection and gives no way to register or explain what it is. -- Mikeblas (talk) 01:39, 13 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete I have tagged it G4 as previously deleted by WP:BLPREQUESTDELETE. Captain Eek  Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 01:50, 13 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Nvm, not a speedy as it was recreated 5 years ago. Still, per the BLP's request, I imagine it should remain deleted. Combined with questionable notability, this is a delete from me. Captain Eek  Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 01:56, 13 January 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete. As well as the other issues discussed above, this appears to be a foundational copyvio of (source dated 2014, current version of article created 2015, and the copied phrases do not appear in the earlier version of the article that was deleted in 2014). —David Eppstein (talk) 19:11, 13 January 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.