Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robin-John Gibb


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   merge to Robin Gibb. — Mr. Stradivarius  (have a chat) 10:18, 7 October 2012 (UTC)

Robin-John Gibb

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Question whether notability is established simply for being a co-writer of one recorded work. JoeBrennan (talk) 16:10, 28 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Weak keep there is some proof of notability from several sources about the one work. SalHamton (talk) 17:53, 28 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 20:20, 28 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 20:20, 28 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 20:20, 28 September 2012 (UTC)


 * Redirect/merge to Robin Gibb, as is often done with less-notable relatives of notable people. Robin-John does not appear to meet the criteria for notability at this time. The links in the article are not about him; they are about the piece he co-wrote with his father. The work itself does not have a Wikipedia article, but it might qualify; however, that does not make its co-author separately notable. We need to see significant coverage about HIM. --MelanieN (talk) 14:49, 1 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Merge to Robin Gibb. There is nothing to inducate that this son is notable yet.  Notability is not inherited.  Peterkingiron (talk) 19:24, 5 October 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.