Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robin DeJarnette


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Rlendog (talk) 18:48, 29 February 2012 (UTC)

Robin DeJarnette

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Apparently fails WP:BIO: non-notable political activist. The only significant coverage I could find is this article, and I'm not sure whether dailykos is a reliable source. (Even if it is, that's not enough to build an article on.) Robofish (talk) 17:24, 21 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Weak Keep - Looks rather unappetizing at first, after all this article was created and edited by only one editor in 2007, and there have been no substantive edits since. I could not find much of her work on Google Books, however some of her work is cited in other books, for example here. A web search brings up some coverage from secondary sources such as here. She's also in the news a bit.  Nothing too impressive, and I'm a strong advocate for the slimming down of extraneous content on this encyclopedia so I usually vote 'delete' when in doubt, but in this case I think she's a keeper.   MisterRichValentine    (talk)  19:53, 21 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete Upon further review Bonewah is right. The sources shown above do not meet notability criteria.  Delete.  MisterRichValentine    (talk)  14:17, 22 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions.  —Tom Morris (talk) 19:53, 21 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete Article does not assert what makes her actually notable. As far as I can tell, she is a garden variety lobbyist and has done nothing to set her apart from any other lobbyist.  The links provided above either only mention her in passing, or are to unreliable sources (Daily KOS) Bonewah (talk) 22:14, 21 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete The subject of this article does not meet the Wikipedia General Notability Guideline. kgrr  talk 03:57, 22 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Virginia-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 02:35, 23 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete doesn't meet WP:BIO, sources provided are week and I'm not finding news coverage to add to it RadioFan (talk) 12:44, 23 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep Yaloe —Preceding undated comment added 03:56, 28 February 2012 (UTC).


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.