Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robin DiMaggio


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 06:53, 30 July 2022 (UTC)

Robin DiMaggio

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

On behalf of Robin DiMaggio, I am asking for deletion of his page. In addition, all the sources on this page are for his fraud case, so as a musician, he does not have any valid sources to qualify for a wiki page and only known for one thing per WP:BLP1E.

Also per WP:BLPREQUESTDELETE:

Where the living subject of a biographical article has requested deletion, the deletion policy says: "Discussions concerning biographical articles of relatively unknown, non-public figures, where the subject has requested deletion and there is no rough consensus, may be closed as delete." In addition, it says: "Poorly sourced biographical articles of unknown, non-public figures, where the discussions have no editor opposing the deletion, may be deleted after discussions have been completed." Aporesing60 (talk) 05:56, 23 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Bands and musicians. Aporesing60 (talk) 05:56, 23 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete I agree as a musician he lacks the sources to qualify as notable. As for the felony, press for embezzlement is fairly run of the mill; that it received the press at the level that it did was the result of clickbait coverage around headlines that could associate him with Arsenio Hall. ShelbyMarion (talk) 11:47, 23 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete - Does not meet GNG, NMUSIC or NCRIME. Agree with ShelbyMarion. Paul W (talk) 12:53, 25 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete - Does not meet WP:MUSICBIO, but as far as GNG, I agree that the news is routine about an incident and not the type of indepth coverage needed.Zeddedm (talk) 21:00, 26 July 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.